The future of the music business...again
I don't think i said anything groundbreaking. I made the point that I no longer listened to music on CDs. That I had them on an Ipod when I listened. That it was difficult to deal with CDs in order to get to the music I wanted, when I wanted.
So here we are 2 years later and the media is full of articles about the seemingly never ending decline in CD sales and the inability of digital sales to close the gap. Can anyone be surprised ?
When was the last time you saw anyone listening to music on a CD Player ? At the gym ? No. At the Mall, maybe only some of the senior walkers at 9am. On downtown streets at lunch ? No.
Does anyone even know what percent of music is listened to via CD any longer ?
I would say the music industry has put itself in the position of being incredibly stupid. They are dependent on a format, the CD, that few people listen to. Although this is a guess, my guess is that the majority of CD purchases are then put in a PC and imported into an MP3 or other format for consumption on a mobile device. Few people buy a CD and just listen to it. Which means you can say goodbye to impulse buying of CDs.
We are in a market where, whether we like it or not, the music industry has tethered us to our PCs. The easiest way to buy, the easiest way to get the greatest utillity of their products is via the PC. Thats a HUGE, HUGE, HUGE mistake. Did i say that it was a huge mistake to make the PC an inevitable part of the music buying process.
Our ability to consume music has gotten incredibly easy over the past 25 years. From the walkman to the CD Walkman to the IPod, we have ditched the album (to the chagrin of milk crate manufacturers everywhere) and evolved to the point where an 80gb IPod has the capacity to carry every song we might imagine listening to over the course of our lifetime. So easy that it revived Apple and catapulted the company from an innovative niche PC marketer to a technology leader. So easy that we consume more music than ever before, yet total sales are in a tailspin.
Can the music industry be saved ? Yep. It would be so easy its scary. Make music available anywhere and everywhere.
How much music can be stored on 1TB of hard drive space ? All of it. How many people does it take to carry a 1TB drive ? My 3 year old daughter can do it.
I would find a manufacturer of cash machines, the ones you see in every bar, restaurant, mini-mart and retail outlet and work with them to reconfigure the machines so that they can hold a hard drive that can be updated with new songs via wired or wireless internet access and whose screen can offer a simple interface for people to select music. The consumer plugs in their SD card from their phone, or plugs the USB cable attached to the machine into their IPod or similar device and the music selected, downloaded and debited to the customers credit or debit card. Pay the machine host a commission, or a per transaction and everyone goes home happy.
Why wouldnt the music industry do this ? I understand the difficulty of getting an entire industry to do anything, particularly the music industry where the fault is always someone elses'. But this is a matter of survival and the solution is simple.
Not that there aren't other issues, Its certainly not a simple process to connect your IPod to a random device and buy music. The future of the music industry depends on the negotation of a software update with Apple. It would be a simple, simple enhancement to ITunes software on every IPod. The software, when connected to one of these music dispensers would look for a unique ID and a number with a check digit. If it found a valid number, it would allow the one way transfer of music from the dispenser. Simple and easy...if Apple goes along. Which they should, because it wouldnt be a stretch to put an ITMS like interface on the dispenser, let people login with their Apple ID, and buy music that could be charged to the credit card on file with Apple.
None of this is rocket science. In fact, its easy. Music Kiosks have been proposed for years and years. Kiosks have been developed time and again. They haven't worked because they have been over engineered and music labels haven't made enough content available.
I hope the music industry has reached the point of desperation where now is the time.
Its time to recognize that its never been easier to listen to music and more people are doing just that than ever before.
The only difficult part of the music equation is buying it. Sitting in front of your PC works sometimes, but it isn't optimal all the time. Where ever you see people listening to music, they should be able to buy and immediately listen to their new music. Why can't the music industry get that we should be able to buy music when we want, where we want, in the format in which we consume it, on our IPods and comparable devices. Until that happens, total music sales will continue to decline and quckly.
Reader Comments
(Page 2)22. All cool ideas...but finding music is still the key. So...where do you hear new music? Radio?..maybe..or shared from friends. Why not broadcast songs via RSS and enable simple 2-way RSS to download. So make a pandora like place for people to drop songs to you and/systemically match your tastes...listen and decide. Hardrives in ATM's? Who uses ATM's? With RSS you can "listen" to your radio-cast anywhere...sync up in case your going out of a wifi connection...XM is going down...Mark (no pun intended) my words.
Posted at 2:17PM on May 29th 2007 by David Armstrong
23. I dunno -- the business of recorded music smells a lot like the business of sheet music 90 years ago. Music will live forever, but an industry built on selling recorded music won't.
Kiosks are interesting but I would see those sales being incremental, not transformative. Allowing iPods and other devices to slurp up music from more than just their host PC is certainly a good idea though -- as long as I can also get legitimately unprotected free music from my friends while I'm at it. I'm more likely to do that than dash to a kiosk when I get the impulse to buy some tune that's stuck in my head.
Still, the business overall is in decline, and smart music companies are looking beyond recordings and getting revenue from the stuff you can't encode and share for free(yet) -- concert tickets, t-shirts and merch, cool fetish-object packaging, and so on.
It gets cheaper and cheaper every day to make a high-quality recording, if you keep your fancy furniture and cocaine budgets under control. So smart musicians (and their smart managers) are treating recorded music like a marketing expense, and know that if 10,000 people are downloading their tunes for free, that's 10,000 more people who might pay $15 to see them play live and buy their t-shirts and cleverly-packaged souvenir discs.
The music industry has a long history of clinging to dead models for just a minute too long -- they wanted radio dead for years before they noticed that it was a marketing tool that could sustain them for decades.
24. CDs are still popular in cars, and have probably been displaced more in that setting by satellite radio than by iPods. The CD player is the centerpiece of the car stereo now, unless you look to specialized units. Alpine shipped its first head unit without a CD player just a month ago. Meanwhile, most of the OEM units are just starting to come standard with an analog input jack. No iPod or other MP3 controls on the head unit... I'd say the market for CD-R media will be strong 5 years out, and CD sales will see a bottom supported by the installed base of automotive players. The old cassette format held on for a long time against CDs while vinyl went niche quickly in the early 90s. I suspect that had a lot to do with car stereos.
Posted at 2:37PM on May 29th 2007 by Brad Hutchings
25. Brad's comment about car stereos would make sense if it was impossible to play MP3 players in cars. But there are currently a multitude of options, especially with popular players like the iPod. Griffin has made a fortune selling iTrip FM transmitters to iPod owners. And for people who buy $400 MP3 players (and often nearly as expensive headphones), what is another $100 to get a car stereo with an AUX in port? Most CD players in cars only get used on the trip from the store to home when a new CD is bought. Then it is converted to a digital format and put away in storage. Car stereos won't save the CD, even for a little while.
Posted at 4:16PM on May 29th 2007 by Nic Bell
26. Marc, I want to bet the guy who said that Internet and Satellite radio is the future of music delivery $10,000 that he's wrong. Do you have a venue for doing that on this blog?!
He may be right about internet as the delivery method, but it won't be because people subscribed to $10/mo internet radio streams.
To be honest, I'm happy with the current progress. I wrote this on 1/03/1999 and it took Steve Jobs over 8 years to agree with this in public... I think things WILL get faster from here though.
Posted at 4:43PM on May 29th 2007 by Robert Seidman
27. i failed the hyperlinking IQ test in your editor (sigh) here's the link to column I wrote in 1999:
http://www.virtualrecordings.com/bottle.htm
Posted at 4:44PM on May 29th 2007 by Robert Seidman
28. Nic's right. Sorry for wasting your time Mark. Funny how a little while after just after I posted that comment, I found myself in a strip mall parking lot and saw a car with one of those visor fold CD holders above the driver seat. So I thought (quietly to myself so as not to attract too much attention), "hey, this is South Orange County, right near a high school, lunch time, trendy affluent people, I wonder if that's the only car with a visor full od CDs" and walked two rows and counted 12 such cars. Imagine the time I could have saved if I had just read Nic's comment!
Posted at 4:44PM on May 29th 2007 by Brad Hutchings
29. Mark,
I think you are dead on. There are many possibilities for a better way to sell music but the industry is to stupid to see the opportunity.
I wrote this article on it quite a while ago
http://www.comtechnews.net/ipod-mp3/the-music-industry-is-stupid
Thanks for another great post!
Posted at 5:20PM on May 29th 2007 by Jack Spirko
30. my two cents:
your point about music ubiquity and the dead cd format are duly noted. it should not be underestimated that music is being pirated - that the consumer has a choice in whether to buy a song(s) or to just download it/them for free. It's been my experience that when that situation exists - largely devoid of consequences (as i recall - the people getting in trouble are the uploaders/hosters - not really the downloaders) people are going to preferably choose the free option. so the format issue aside - the industry will still face an erosion in actual sales that belies the wide user base. The nature of the internet makes it such that they no longer can reliably depend on the sales of music as a method of business operation.
The summer before I started college - I did web design for a law firm here in ny. one of the attys left to work for the WWE (wrestling) and we kept in touch. wrestling has an interesting model - they own IP rights for the "characters" in their performances. for example - dwayne "the rock" johnson is a character partly owned by the wwe. in order to use his wrestling fueled celebrity - wwe collects and is listed as producer on all the films he does (and presumably negotiates fees for the use of their IP). Record Labels - AFAIK - do not get IP rights on artists despite being integral in the development, sound, look, and general image of an artist. Record labels invest in the IP of artist X - but does not really benefit from the artist touring/movies/endorsements/etc. that would not exist without that capital investment and investment in the shaping of IP.
I propose that music be FREE. Record labels get IP percentages on all artists across a wide range of potential revenue sources. So the label gets points on the justin timberlake mcdonald's commercial, and on 50 cent's vitamin water deal. they also get points on all shows and performances. also, record labels ACTIVELY develop live video content for television (MASH-UP shows for example - introduce new music on broadcast specials featuring collaborations with hot artists, etc.). then the record labels get into business of selling content to distribution systems and not to the public. this changes the industry - and the artists will work harder now than ever (having consulted for the music industry - artists work very hard) because their money will come from performances , endorsements, and content created for distribution... and the music they create will essentially be the honey attracting the dollars to them.
it will change the kind of artists who get signed and who thrive as the focus will return to live performance and showmanship, etc.
my solution solves everyone's problem.
ancillary source of revenue will be product placement in the shows/concerts/etc.
in my scheme, you want downloaders - in fact you can make downloading free and restrict hosting is all - i.e. you can't host my stuff but you can get it for free and tell your friends where to get it. Then you get accurate numbers of downloads and you get EYEBALLS. win/win b/c you now hit them with ads to further generate revenue. partner with google and have them foot the bandwidth - they seem eager to do so anyway. printing money all over again.
Posted at 5:56PM on May 29th 2007 by blyx
31. I have an excellent idea that takes this a step further....but I can't share it here.
Posted at 5:58PM on May 29th 2007 by EDub
32. My name is Jacob Rosen and I am an aspiring young sports statistician. It is not everyday that you hear those words come out of the mouth of a 16-year-old from Akron, Ohio, but I am an anomaly. I have been sending out weekly statistical reports from the world of sports for the past year and a half. I have been ranking teams from college football for three years, and the NBA and MLB for two years. My passion is sports and my love is numbers.
Thus, it is only fitting that I would come across the most influential general manager in sport's blog. I am very impressed with the way statistics are implemented in the Dallas Mavericks organization and I credit a lot of that to your excellent entrepreneurship. While I am only 16 and have many more years of education in front of me before I can accomplish my dream of a being a general manager in sports, it would be an honor if you would e-mail me back.
Just to know that somebody might be interested in a stat-whiz like me is a very encouraging thing. Just recently I started my own blog and it contains everything from my weekly e-mail report. I hope you enjoy!
Posted at 7:33PM on May 29th 2007 by Jacob Rosen
33. If it is a band I really like I want to own the CD, I like to see the CD art and flip through the book inside. Immediately after that it is backed up onto my music drive,, re-backed up onto an external 500gb drive where copies of everything are stored, and then dropped into my iPod. The CD is placed on the CD rack never to be seen again.
And since my iPod hooks into my living room entertainment system... I dont ever need the CD again.
Posted at 8:03PM on May 29th 2007 by Kenn Burgess
34. > How much music can be stored on 1TB of hard drive space ?
> All of it.
Pshaw.
All of Pearl Jams releases, fair enough.
But all of Pearl Jams releases, in "lossless" format,
would probably take about 1/2 TB in their own right:
http://www.gracenote.com/music/search-adv.html?q=&qartist=pearl+jam&qdisc=&qtrack=&n=25&x=49&y=10
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Jam_Official_Bootlegs
The qualitative assumptions that seem to be behind both an
assertion like the one above, and the typical "holds (N),000
songs" are a great disservice to both the music listener,
and to the music.
I don't find any claim that of "MP3's are/can be CD quality"
credible. I do think that MP3s can be of sufficient quality
for much content, and many listening environments. But
clearly, a sound argument can be made that "CD Lossless"
is a more relevant success criteria; while other (Neil
Young, for example) demonstrate that "CD Quality" is
INADEQUATE for some listening experiences.
Irrespective of the "encoding/capacity" aspects, this denies
the vast ocean of how much music there is out there.
- Gracenote/CDDB claims to have over (6) MILLION CDs
indexed
http://www.gracenote.com/music/index_old.html
- This does not include the (40,000) concerts, and
140,000 songs, available from ARCHIVE.ORG
http://www.archive.org/index.php
- ... nor does it include the significant volume of
content available in NON-CD format from artist sites,
etc.
- or even much of what is available in CD format
from "direct"/"alternate" channels
- It also does NOT include a great deal of legacy (vinyl,
tape) content that hasn't yet "made the jump" to CD
(but which can indeed be "ripped" with common
equipment.
On the other hand, if by "all of it ..." you mean what is
played YourLocalClearcastChannel, or American Idol ... then
nevermind ...
Posted at 8:35PM on May 29th 2007 by Sean Finn
35. CDs are what I use to collect autographs on - at live shows and festivals. This demonstrates to the musician (you remember, those nice people that do all the real work in the 'industry'), that you cared enough about them to buy their album. Next, the CDs become my backup in case M'R F'Rs sucker-punch my system with a virus. CDs are also what musicians can inexpensively manufacture to promote themselves at live shows, etc.
No matter what technological advances are made, musicians have the hardest road to victory than any other link in the 'industry'. If the music industry really wanted to help musicians and/or fans, they would funnel more money into music education (at least Apple and MS do that). The music 'industry' has created their own problems and solutions - the fewer no-talents, clogging up the works with new-fangled deceptions and conditions, the better.
Posted at 8:45PM on May 29th 2007 by saM FFL
36. With so much access to music nowadays one has to not only question whether the CD format will ever rebound but if the concept of "buying" music in itself is heading towards extinction. The whole notion of purchasing music was to be able to play what you want when you want. Now that can be accomplished without paying for nothing but access (online connection, pc, portable storage) so paying for stand alone music starts to make little sense to the young crowd. If I spend 5 hours a day on My Space all the hit music is on the artist page for me to listen to on demand whenever I want and my circle of friends
Will IM me any new music I’m not up on or need for my I Pod. You have Last.fm, endless music blogs and message boards that leak the latest hits 20 minutes after the promotional department at the label email blasts it to their DJ list for “feedback”. It wouldn’t be too bad if I only surfed the Internet for little bit then went to the real world but nowadays for the young kids the Internet IS their world so why purchase anything at all?
With that being said the future points towards licensing with the cost of creation being the lost leader. The label of the future will be more of a partnership with the artist splitting profits in all possible revenue streams. The business will be completely niche out so instead of 100 superstars you will have 10,000 artists making just enough money to keep going as the business becomes further decentralized. For the rock acts the road will be the money savior because like someone said before that’s something you can’t bootleg. The problem is artist development must return to the forefront because nobody’s coughing up big bucks to some garbage fly by act. Hip Hop never did well with shows but the CD format on a regional independent level will maintain the business and eventually flourish as the “street album” takes the blocks by storm. The Google’s and Yahoo’s of the world can back emerging “mini-labels” with the cash and reach to create the new music stars.
Posted at 9:16PM on May 29th 2007 by Mitch Reisendorf
37. CDs still have a niche. They're still my preferred format for purchase since they are 100% lossless; if I buy digital I'm getting a lossy file containing maybe 10% of the digital information of the original. Then, I have to convert it to mp3 or ogg if I actually want to use it in my automobile, home stereo or my Linux computer. By then, of course, I'm left with 10% of 10%, or 1%, and the file sounds like that old 8-track in your father's 1971 El Camino. So, buying iTunes tracks encoded at a pathetic 128 kbps just doesn't cut it.
Additionally, most purchased music suffers leaves one vulnerable to vendor lock-in. If you have a different type of music player that doesn't support .m4b files (basically, anything that isn't an iPod) Americans have two choices: get an iPod or violate the DMCA. The same goes for Linux users (a class much more numerous than most believe).
Kudos to the Grateful Dead for making their music available for purchase in FLAC, an open, lossless format. Too bad other music isn't widely available in this format.
Posted at 9:32PM on May 29th 2007 by Joey Zasa
38. One of the ATM kiosk companies is based literally right in Mark's backyard of Carrolton, Texas - http://www.tidel.com/index.asp
WiFi kiosks are a nice interim solution, but I really think that it would be more efficient to use my cell phone as a point of purchase device that could discover what music was playing around me - whether it's in a Starbucks, in my car, at the movies or on TV. A small app would let me scroll through music that my device has "heard" or had the tune id broadcast to on a sub-audio channel and I could press 'buy' right there on the phone. My cell bill would be charged for each song individually, or it would be part of a minute/music package.
The iPhone and it's clones are bound to have something close to this capability and will therefore grab a larger share of the consumer music purchasing pie.
This would be especially hurtful to the retailers if my cell phone camera could take a picture of a CD's barcode and automatically download the album to my PC or device - legally through an electronic wallet application or illegally through a bittorrent site.
Posted at 10:20PM on May 29th 2007 by Marc Nathan
39. There already is an industry for music kiosks.
http://signifi.com/05a_QuickTunes.html
I'm guessing that the reason they haven't taken off is similar to what you've been saying, the music industry just doesn't really support it.
Posted at 11:02PM on May 29th 2007 by Kyle
40. The reason the music business is losing money is not the death of the cd, but rather the death of the album. In the past, if you heard a song you liked on the radio you had to shell out $10+ bucks for the album and there was a decent chance you were only going to like a handful of songs. But you had to pay for the bad to get the good Now, if you hear a song you like you pay 99 cents. Basically, people have to buy at least 10 singles to cover the revenue the labels used to make off of one album and it aint happening.
Posted at 1:51AM on May 30th 2007 by mark

21. Interesting commentary. Although consuming music does tether me to my PC, when I'm at my PC is when I usually have time to browse and purchase music selections. When I'm in a place that would have a music kiosk -- like an ATM or a mall or the gym -- I don't necessarily have the time to devote to browsing music selections. However, the gym is where I listen to my iPod, so if a turnkey solution was available there I'm sure I would use it. I can see it now...droves of people cancelling gym memberships because all they do when they go there is download music. ;-)
Posted at 2:12PM on May 29th 2007 by Glenn Laudenslager