Why Yahoo should say Yes to MicroSoft
If you look at Yahoo singularly, it is a great company. For he and David Filo to build a company with more than 6B in sales and more than 25B in market cap is an astounding feat . Unfortunately for Yahoo, it has had to weather both the Internet Bubble Bursting and the emergence of Google as a force in search and online advertising.
These are both issues because Wall Street has made them issues. The bubble speaks for itself. Google is a Wall Street issue for Yahoo because Wall Street wants Yahoo to keep up with the Googles.
That's a problem for Jerry. Building a world class Yahoo to be the best company it possibly can be using the management skills that Jerry and company have is a far different challenge than optimizing the stock price. Particularly when Google is your stock comp.
Which is exactly why Jerry and David should sell to MSFT.
If there is one thing Microsoft does well , its ignore Wall Street and invest in its corporate strategies. It has so many huge lines of business, that Wall Street has learned to just let those that need to germinate do so. XBox. MSN. Online. Microsoft gets more leash from Wall Street to develop businesses than any company on the planet.
So the question isn't whether Yahoo should sell. It should. The only question is what the structure of the deal should look like so that Jerry and David can achieve many of the goals they set out to accomplish on the net under the MSFT umbrella. Jerry definitely is about customers first. This is his chance to show it. This deal accelerates his opportunity to get customers where he wants to take them if he negotiates it right. Something I dint think would be that hard. There is too much upside for Microsoft to nitpick the non financial deal points.
What about Google ?
Google also is a company that wants to put its strategic goals ahead of what Wall Street wants. When the stock is trending up, that's easy to do. If we are in the middle of a market correction of any severity at all, then Google could get hit with its own Wall Street "double whammy".
First the downward pressure on its stock price. After several days of seeing the stock down 50 bucks during the trading day, Google is feeling exactly what Yahoo felt when the bubble burst. That queasy sense of fear around the company. The questioning of what could possibly happen to the stock, the impact on employee options and the inevitable questioning of Google traditions. 10 to 20pct of your time on other projects ? Not when the stock price is down 200 dollars in the past 3 months. Again.
The 2ND whammy would happen if Yahoo was no longer a stand alone stock. Even if the Google stock price suffered, there was always the comfort of "outperforming Yahoo". Wall Street, employees, small stock owners always had the Yahoo stock comp to give it confidence. If its not there, all the eyes are staring right at Google evaluating and questioning every number and corporate action.
Its a level of scrutiny and pressure that can and will change the corporate culture of any company going through a maturation phase.
So Yahoo should say yes. Its less about the money than about finally achieving the corporate goals set out more than a decade ago.
One time Jerry told me that Yahoo stood for You Always Have Other Options. This time Yahoo doesn't, but their customers options could improve exponentially if Yahoo says yes.
Reader Comments
(Page 1)2. Nice points. Aren't you making a rather optimistic assumption that Yahoo HAS a choice of whether to say yes or no.
After almost crashing the ship, I don't think the commanders will have the confidence to stand up to the shareholders and suggest any of the more complex transactions people have been floating around the blog world.
Nope - this is going to morph to a shareholder value play. Bye-Bye Yahoo independence (I will not totally rule out a Google bid here either).
Thanks for pointing out the road ahead for Google. I was roundly ridiculed in mid November when I wrote about the craziness of Google sponsoring a $ 30 million contest to get to mars, funding "hundreds of millions of dollars for green energy" and obtaining NASA landing rights for their twin wide-body Boeing 767-200s.
Posted at 10:52PM on Feb 3rd 2008 by Wayne Schulz
3. oops - I meant fund a contest to get to the MOON and not Mars
Posted at 10:54PM on Feb 3rd 2008 by Wayne Schulz
4. This deal does not excite me either way. As you can explain to us all, tech survival is about innovation. If a Yahoo acquisition gives a rebirth to Microsoft's lost ability to innovate, then they win. If not, they lose and take Yahoo down with them. A premium offer like this is a must for the folks at Yahoo to strongly consider and then take. Same rules apply to Google, innovate or become the next Microsoft. If this fuels their ability to innovate, then everybody wins, especially the tech consumer. Let's just hope Microsoft does not do to the internet, what they did to the PC.
5. I've been using Yahoo since almost day one, have had an e-mail account there for more than 10 years now. I'm not sure, as a consumer, that I welcome the acquisition.
As a shareholder, that's a different question.
Posted at 11:14PM on Feb 3rd 2008 by David
6. I agree, Y! should jump all over this. Yes, yes, yes! What I'm having a hard time with is why MS wants to buy Y!? I mean, they already operate a search engine / portal. So it has to be for the Y! properties, right? But wait, if the properties are re-branded after a MS purchase, don't they lose all their value? Buying market share? Maybe, I'll go along with that...but $44B? Is there something else going on that I'm missing? Patents maybe, IP locked deep within the dark caverns of their data centers? Help me understand...
-Thom
7. Mark, it's Microsoft (lowercase "s"), not MicroSoft. Just like it's the Dallas Mavericks, not the Dallas MavEriCks.
Thanks
Posted at 12:50AM on Feb 4th 2008 by Scott
8. Gee, Mark Cuban pressing the "greater sucker" theory again? I told you awhile ago, Yahoo was a dying business. Now you want them to pull a Cuban... sell while the company still has an illusion of value. Great strategy from a guy who has made a fortune selling dreams...
Bad part is that you are right. Yahoo should sell now while it is still semi-relevant. But Yang should do what you did and cash out. Because MS would just be buying an anchor. Both companies have failed to mount credible charges on Google, even with the advantages of cash (MS) and imbedded position (Yahoo). So what could either of them gain by merging? Stupidity + stupidity = guess what? Google has better MINDS and a long-term strategic vision... has Yahoo ever? As for MS, this move is sheer desperation, a stop-gap at most. It'll give MS the APPEARANCE of having a relevant strategy related to search and online advertising but that will just be a mirage. The reality is that it will be the blending of two companies NEITHER of which has a credible strategy regarding Google. And the improved market share benefit to MS won't hide that fact. The move won't stop the Google train.
Trust me, if Google opposes this move it will only be because it knows that it has Yahoo and MS against the ropes and would prefer to "divide and conquer" while it has the advantage rather than deal with Microhoo (or Yahoosoft?), which would fail just as surely but be around a lot longer.
Tell your man to snatch those chips while they're still on the table. Because the price will be dropping every day from here on out. In a couple of years, Google will buy Yahoo for a song if MS doesn't snatch 'em first. And it won't do it as nicely as MS.
BTW, nice move hooking up with the Weinsteins. Too bad that did nothing for the actual quality of your movies. You can't get away with selling puffery with movies, you have to have a good product. Keep trying though... you know what they say, even a blind pig finds a truffle once in a while.
Posted at 2:07AM on Feb 4th 2008 by James King
9. How do you see AOL in this mix ? whats the next move for these guys ?
Posted at 2:27AM on Feb 4th 2008 by T.H.
10. I agree, putting yourself in yahoo's situation, sell sell sell. But for me personally I would like to see the deal fall through just because I'm not a fan of giant corporations eating their opponents.
Posted at 2:46AM on Feb 4th 2008 by Adam Pritchard
11. I would argue that this development could be viewed through a different lens - Microsoft trying to build on its strategy of dominating ubiquitous computing. Google can win search and advertising race; Microsoft can try to win the race for dominating mobile, automotive and living room computing.
I have a more detailed analysis on http://www.anshublog.com
Posted at 3:52AM on Feb 4th 2008 by Anshu Sharma
12. The thought of Microsoft getting bigger makes me sick to my stomach. Right now, there are three consumer based IT companies that matter: Google, Microsoft and Apple. They're no longer just "IT" companies, either; they're forcing their ways into every facet of the lives of anyone in a developed country. That's three companies, and now Microsoft wants to get bigger?
No. We need a lot more smaller pieces, not two big behemoths slamming it out, because when that happens, the losers are the consumers. We don't have any choices at that point; the only question is just a matter of the size of the phallus that's screwing you. This wouldn't be a problem if Americans would educate themselves better than what large corporate entities throw at them, but since everyone feeds from the trough like good little pigs, it's hard to get anyone smaller.
There is nothing good that can come out of Microsoft buying Yahoo for the consumer. The shareholders are geeked, but the consumers are screwed.
Posted at 4:31AM on Feb 4th 2008 by Christopher Bowen
13. You're right on money. Syncing Flicker with My Photos. Syncing Yahoo mail with free outlook. Merging IMs. Extending pipes. And turning that and all the rest into ad supported services will craft a place for brand advertisers online. MSFT&Yahoo has a much better chance to snag the top 500 advertisers from TV than Google does.
Posted at 5:52AM on Feb 4th 2008 by Morgan Warstler
14. Cause The Microssoft have to much and we don't want monopolist in the web.
Posted at 8:31AM on Feb 4th 2008 by Tworzenie Stron
15. I'm an ex-MSFTie with 12 years in the company ending in '03 including time at MSN at the end of my tenure. The model that Jerry should be shooting for in his negotiations is Xbox. Xbox operates largely as a separate company and culture well off the main campus. When MSN's ad business was off the radar early this decade (all the sr exec focus was on building an ISP AOL-killer), MSN had a renaissance making its first profit, establishing its leadership role in the ad industry (ask anyone who was involved with the IAB - the industry trade group), etc. Once it was obvious that the AOL-killer strategy was braindead and MSN's ad business became a $1B business, it got the sr execs attention to its demise. They started hooking everything in MSN to Windows and Office (from a branding and technology standpoint).
Meanwhile, Xbox had a long leash and wasn't shackled by Windows. Look who is having greater success now. Xbox is kicking MSN/Windows Live's tail. The fact that Yahoo is in the valley is a blessing. All the Internet business should be HQ'ed there well away from Redmond yet have the long-term orientation that Microsoft is famous for that Yahoo doesn't have the benefit of given its public company status.
Posted at 8:35AM on Feb 4th 2008 by Dave Chase
17. I hope Yahoo accepts if only to stir up the search industry. For about 5 years now Google has been a virtual monopoly with a 60 to 80 percent of all searches. We need some competition.
Plus there's the fact that MS hates Google. If the deal goes through it will make for an even hotter war between the two.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
Posted at 1:27PM on Feb 4th 2008 by How Billionaires Do it
18. Very thought provoking. Have you seen Google's post on the acquisition? Looks like they are posturing to object.
Posted at 2:30PM on Feb 4th 2008 by David Mackey
19. lakers got gasol. mwhaha
Posted at 3:07PM on Feb 4th 2008 by vincejs
20. "What you all are missing about Google"
By Robert Scoble
http://scobleizer.com/2008/02/04/what-you-all-are-missing-about-google
Posted at 4:00PM on Feb 4th 2008 by RobbHand

1. I'm a Google fanboy, but I hope Microsoft buys Yahoo just so that GOOG will have competition. As we all know, the customer suffers when there is no competition. And even though I'm a shareholder in both companies (actually, all three companies) I can't help but look at this from the perspective of a customer/user first.
Mike
Posted at 9:04PM on Feb 3rd 2008 by Mike MacLeod